| Q 4:1 Where do we find the rules relating to leased employees? |
| Q 4:2 What is a PEO? |
| Q 4:3 What is a leasing organization? |
| Q 4:4 What is a Client Organization or CO? |
| Q 4:5 What is a recipient? |
| Q 4:6 Is there a difference between a recipient and a CO? |
| Q 4:7 What is a Worksite Employee? |
| Q 4:8 What is a leased employee? |
| Q 4:9 What is the difference between a leased employee and a Worksite
Employee? |
| Q 4:10 Can an independent contractor be both a leased employee and a leasing
organization? |
| Q 4:11 Must a leased employee be a common law employee of the leasing
organization? |
| Q 4:12 Can someone who is a common law employee of a recipient be a leased
employee of the same recipient? |
| Q 4:13 How can I tell if the leasing organization or the recipient is the true
common law employer? |
| Q 4:14 Are there any legislative proposals to address the issue of who employs
workers under a leasing arrangement? |
| Q 4:15 Should a PEO firm be prepared to pay the wages of those on their
payroll, whether or not the firm is paid by the recipient? |
| Q 4:16 Have there been any IRS rulings that a leasing organization is the true
employer? |
| Q 4:17 Have there been any court cases on whether the leasing organization is
the true employer? |
| Q 4:18 What are the consequences of the worker being a common law employee of
the leasing organization? |
| Q 4:19 What are the consequences of the worker being a common law employee of
the recipient? |
| Q 4:20 Is it possible that a worker is a common law employee of both the
recipient and the leasing organization? |
| Q 4:21 If the contract between the PEO and the CO says they are co-employers,
does that make them dual employers? |
| Q 4:22 Does it matter if state law provides that the PEO is a co-employer?
|
| Q 4:23 Can you summarize the consequences of different entities being the
employer? |
| Q 4:24 How did the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (SBJPA) affect
common law employee status? |
| Q 4:25 What constitutes working on a substantially full-time basis for the
recipient? |
| Q 4:26 What hours count for purposes of the substantially full-time basis
determination? |
| Q 4:27 Do hours spent performing services for businesses other than the plan
sponsor count for purposes of meeting the substantially full-time requirement?
|
| Q 4:28 What is the computation period for determining whether services are
performed substantially full-time? |
| Q 4:29 Can a plan treat a worker as a leased employee even if the worker has
not met the substantially full-time requirement? |
| Q 4:30 What determines if the employee is working under the primary direction
and control of the recipient? |
| Q 4:31 What are the pension consequences of being a leased employee?
|
| Q 4:32 How is compensation of the leased employee determined? |
| Q 4:33 How does the recipient treat contributions and benefits the leasing
organization provides the recipient? |
| Q 4:34 Can a recipient’s plan offset contributions made to the leasing
organization’s plan to determine if IRC §401(a)(4) is satisfied? |
| Q 4:35 How does IRC §414(q), relating to highly compensated employees, relate
to the leased employee rules? |
| Q 4:36 How are hours of service for eligibility and vesting credited for
leased employees? |
| Q 4:37 Must the recipient cover a leased employee under the recipient’s plan?
|
| Q 4:38 Does a worker ever lose the status of leased employee? |
| Q 4:39 What is the safe harbor exception? |
| Q 4:40 What does it mean that leased employees constitute no more than 20% of
a recipient’s nonhighly compensated work force? 04-40_files/filelist.xml |
| Q 4:41 What is a safe harbor plan? |
| Q 4:42 How do the leased employee rules apply to benefit plans other than
retirement plans? |
| Q 4:43 How do the leased employee rules affect a “lease to own” situation?
|
| Q 4:44 Can an employer obtain a ruling from the IRS regarding leased employee
status? |
| Q 4:45 Can a PEO obtain a ruling from the IRS on whether its Worksite
Employees are its common law employees? |
| Q 4:46 Can a company that leases employees file form 5500-EZ? |
| Q 4:47 What is Rev. Proc. 2002-21? |
| Q 4:48 What special terms does Rev. Proc. 2002-21 define? |
| Q 4:49 Why did the IRS issue Rev. Proc. 2002-21? |
| Q 4:50 What are the benefits of complying with Rev. Proc. 2002-21? |
| Q 4:51 What are the consequences of not complying with Rev. Proc. 2002-21?
|
| Q 4:52 Can a PEO plan established after May 13, 2002 receive the relief
available through Rev. Proc. 2002-21? |
| Q 4:53 Can a PEO defined benefit plan receive the relief available through
Rev. Proc. 2002-21? |
| Q 4:54 How does a PEO comply with Rev. Proc. 2002-21? |
| Q 4:55 What information must be in the PEO’s notice? |
| Q 4:56 What options does a CO have in response to a PEO’s notice? |
| Q 4:57 Can a PEO limit or restrict a CO’s choices? |
| Q 4:58 What must a CO do to cosponsor a PEO multiple employer plan under Rev.
Proc. 2002-21? |
| Q 4:59 What must a CO do to have the PEO transfer its Worksite Employee’s plan
assets to a CO plan under Rev. Proc. 2002-21? |
| Q 4:60 What happens if a CO does not make a choice in response to a PEO’s
notice? |
| Q 4:61 What happens if a CO does not timely comply with all the requirements
for its choice in response to a PEO’s notice? |
| Q 4:62 How can notices be given under Rev. Proc. 2002-21? |
| Q 4:63 What does the PEO do with the Spinoff Retirement Plan? |
| Q 4:64 When must assets be transferred from the PEO plan to the Spinoff
Retirement Plan? |
| Q 4:65 When must assets be transferred from the PEO plan to the plans of
electing COs? |
| Q 4:66 If the PEO decides to terminate its plan and to comply with Rev. Proc.
2002-21, will there be any assets in the plan after the Compliance Date? |
| Q 4:67 What does it mean to distribute from the Spinoff Retirement Plan and
the terminating PEO plan “as soon as administratively feasible”? |
| Q 4:68 Must distributions be made to participants even if the 401(k)
distribution restrictions would be violated? |
| Q 4:69 Is the PEO required to seek determination letters regarding its
terminated or converted plan and the Spinoff Retirement Plan? |
| Q 4:70 How is top heavy status determined in the first year after conversion
to a multiple employer plan? |
| Q 4:71 Can plans under IRS audit use Rev. Proc. 2002-21? |
| Q 4:72 Can a PEO Retirement Plan use EPCRS to address qualification errors
other than those discussed for which relief is afforded? |
| Q 4:73 Does Rev. Proc. 2002-21 alter the determination of employee status of
Worksite Employees? |
| Q 4:74 Does Rev. Proc. 2002-21 affect the determination of leased employee
status? |
| Q 4:75 Does Rev. Proc. 2002-21 provide relief for COs? |
| Q 4:76 Does Rev. Proc. 2002-21 affect employer welfare benefit plans
established by a PEO? |